Sunday, 17 May 2015

Mad Max - Fury Road : The Bugle's Verdict

with 0 Comment
Mad Max Tom Hardy Charlize TheronWhat a lovely day! The general reaction of the cinema crowd was in rhythm with the film’s subtitle. Mad Max re-awakens after 30 years, and how! This is one movie series that just keeps on getting better with the years. Seriously! George Miller has to be quite the twisted guy for dreaming up the plethora of even more twisted characters we got to witness in all his films but regardless, his visualisation of the vestiges of the human race in a desolate world has been raising brows and collecting gasps ever since the original film came out in 1979, for reasons we shall see below.

No other filmmaker has been able to capture and present dystopia in the manner Miller gave the world Mad Max. It has been the cinematic bible for apocalypse nerds globally, and it seems the trend shall continue with Fury Road which is madder, wilder and much more intense than all three previous films combined.

In the previous films, I never really got the idea behind the title ‘Mad’ attached to Max Rockatansky, the eponymous lead. Max (Tom Hardy) had always been a composed character. Sure, he was a loner, and much of his time is spent doing the same things the rest of his surrounding violent world is upto – looting, scavenging and fighting to find his way. His world as stated in the film, “is reduced to one instinct – survive.” Going by his circumstances and the people he is always pitted against, he must be one of the sanest people around. However, Fury Road finally provides some justice, and brings out the true colours of madness in Max, instances of which are seen in the initial scenes themselves.

The audience is jolted out of their 30-year long slumber by a really fast-moving, really violent sequence where Max gets captured in order that his blood may be harvested for the soldiers of a god-king, Immortan Joe. For almost half an hour of the film, Max’s face remains hidden in a metal mask, and this entire time he is ‘madly’ trying to escape from the clutches of his captors, who are out to retrieve Imperator Furiosa (Charlize Theron), a rogue soldier who has escaped with the god-king’s collection of premium breeding Wives.

The fundamental premise of the film follows the same routine as the previous instalments. Max, through a random turn of events, finds himself smack in the middle of Furiosa’s sticky situation, and out of the inherent goodness of his heart, helps her turn things around, being ‘The Maximum Force of The Future’ and leaves after the job is done, for further misadventures in the Australian wasteland (The films’ are set in Australia, for the uninitiated), and possibly another sequel. BUT make no mistake, this movie isn’t about Max.

For once the epicentre is someone else, and that is the female lead, Furiosa. Tom Hardy’s presence is reduced to that of a supporting character in the face of Charlize Theron’s Furiosa, who robs most of the show and acts as the lead action source. Her portrayal of a hardened woman, out on a life-or-death mission (in their world, everything is life-or-death) is genuine, and as was expected from Theron, even though her accent is completely un-Australian, and with the one-liners, she seems like the quintessential Hollywood action hero. Even her native South African accent could have lent some authenticity to the role. Apart from this chink, the rest of her show is fine.

Somehow, Tom Hardy is not someone I could visualise in the role of Max. Agreed, Max is a hard man, testosterone flowing out of his ears, but Tom Hardy seems WAY too rough and rugged for the part. For those who have seen the previous films with Mel Gibson, he was a softer personality. He was like a chocolate boy with the added traits of a highway motorcyclist. Hardy gives off the impression of a figure such as a mercenary, one who has seen way too much war in his life, and has been shaped and moulded by it accordingly, which would have been fine, but if you compare Gibson in Beyond the Thunderdome (1985) with Hardy, the latter seems comparatively younger. And when you’re following a linear chronology, ignoring something like that just doesn’t fly.

Getting back to the story, the film holds firm both in terms of its adrenaline as well as the sociological and philosophical quotient. Like its predecessors, Fury Road explores into the awry condition of humans, and the changes and burdens and scarcities society would face post a global war over the most precious resource of the modern world – fuel.

Noting down the idea of something such is one thing, and getting an entire team of actors to pull it off for you, is another and director George Miller just doesn’t get tired of extending the benchmark. The sets and costumes too are extraordinary, and in concurrence with the crazy facets of the remaining tribal humans.

In terms of action, the film is one of the most satisfactory experiences I’ve had recently, with almost 1 and a half hour worth of explosive vehicular action out of its length of 2 hours, and keeping true to his name, Miller presents some of the most realistic and sincerely chilling action sequences one can witness. Add to that the heavy thumping war music and the immersive drums, and you yourself are lost in the madness and the chaos.



VERDICT – George Miller reclaims his territory in chaos and dystopia, upping the gore, the explosions as well as the heart, ensuring that Mad Max: Fury Road provides a notch more than the regular expectations of the adrenaline junkies, and caters to the seasoned viewers as well. Go take a drive down Fury Road and take a plunge into madness.

0 comments:

Post a Comment

Followers

Translate

Powered by Blogger.